Pages

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Native Americans Descended From a Single Ancestral Group, DNA Study Confirms


April 28, 2009

For two decades, researchers have been using a growing volume of genetic data to debate whether ancestors of Native Americans emigrated to the New World in one wave or successive waves, or from one ancestral Asian population or a number of different populations.

Now, after painstakingly comparing DNA samples from people in dozens of modern-day Native American and Eurasian groups, an international team of scientists thinks it can put the matter to rest: Virtually without exception the new evidence supports the single ancestral population theory.

“Our work provides strong evidence that, in general, Native Americans are more closely related to each other than to any other existing Asian populations, except those that live at the very edge of the Bering Strait,” said Kari Britt Schroeder, a lecturer at the University of California, Davis, and the first author on the paper describing the study.

“While earlier studies have already supported this conclusion, what’s different about our work is that it provides the first solid data that simply cannot be reconciled with multiple ancestral populations,” said Schroeder, who was a Ph.D. student in anthropology at the university when she did the research.

The study is published in the May issue of the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Cont. here:

http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=9101





© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Monday, April 27, 2009

ROBESON COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING

*WHAT: ROBESON COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING

WHEN: SATURDAY, MAY 2ND, 2009

WHERE: O. P. OWENS AGRICULTURE BUILDING, LUMBERTON, NC

PUBLIC IS WELCOME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


TOPIC: THE SURVIVAL OF THE LOST COLONY: THE UNTOLD STORY by William V.
Pate*

At 2pm on Saturday, May 2nd, the guest speaker at the Robeson County
Historical and Genealogical Society monthly meeting in Lumberton will be
William V. Pate, resident of Hope Mills and author of “*The Survival of the
Lost Colony: The Untold Story*”. The public is invited to attend and to
purchase an autographed copy of Mr. Pate’s book at a reduced price.

Mr. Pate examines the suppositions given for the disappearance of members of
Sir Walter Raleigh’s colony on North Carolina’s Roanoke Island in 1587. Most
historians have theorized that, after they stayed behind when their ships
sailed back to England for supplies, the colonists were murdered by hostile
savages [meaning unChristian people] or died of starvation. Most North
Carolinians hold to the theory that these colonists survived by being
assimilated into the local Croatoan Indian tribe.

In his 33 years of research, Mr. Pate examined countless documents of the
period, many written by men of authority on the expedition. His book
provides verbatim transcriptions followed by his comments on the insights
they provide for solving this mystery.

The author’s prints and lists of the people & places connected to this
colonization are an unexpected benefit for readers. He includes tales handed
down by local Indians that Virginia Dare, the first person born in the
Roanoke colony, lies buried near the base of a several-hundred-years-old
tree in Robeson County. Of special interest to Robesonians will be the DNA
project that many expect to provide a definitive answer to part of this old
American mystery.

The program will be held in the O.P. Owens Agriculture Center Auditorium at
455 Caton Road, which is just west of Interstate 95 between Highways 72 and
711 in Lumberton (next to the Robeson County Health Department). To
accommodate the public, the speaker will precede the meeting.

Contact Sam West sam.west.1@gmail.com

UPDATE: Hat Tip: Joy King

“The Survival of The Lost Colony” is $19.95, which includes shipping. Write to 2550 Thrower Road, Hope Mills, NC 28348, or call 910-483-9960.



© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Monday, April 13, 2009

A Look at the Patronymic Naming System

by Janet Crain
It is interesting to note that two preeminent Lost Colony researchers; both William Powell and David Beers Quinn, stated that some of the Lost Colonists were Welsh. With that in mind an investigation into the surnames of the colonists reveals many considered Welsh.

The following possibly Welsh surnames were borne by these persons who visited the Island of Roanoke on one or more trips made there in the 1580's.

Carrow - Carew
Cecil - variant of Seisyll
Chevan - variant of Evan?
Ellis
Evans
Gibbs - variant of Gibby?
Griffyn
Humphrey
Jenkins
Jones*
Perry (could be Parry)
Pew usually spelled Pugh from ap Hugh (son of Hugh)
Phevens usually spelled Plevens from ap Evans
Powell from ap Howell (for Prince Hywel very popular name)
Pugh from ap Hugh
Robyns
Robert*
Vaughan
Williams*
Wythers

*(sometimes)

1587 was early in the use of surnames in Wales, lending credence to a theory that if these persons were Welsh, they had already emigrated to England prior to joining the other colonists who set out to establish Raleigh Citee in the New World. They could have come into contact with John White in London where a tight little community of craftsmen and trades people lived. Several Colonists have been documented to be from that area of London. Everyone needed to have a skilled trade such as tiler, mason, carpentry, etc to contribute to the success of this venture. They may have been part of this community. But it is also conceivable that simply their entry into the larger world of joining this enterprise required the adoption of a surname for legal and social purposes.

Therefore it will be useful to learn a little bit about the Welsh Patromymin Naming System as an aid in recognizing Welsh surnames. The patronymic naming system is defined as:

adj.

Of, relating to, or derived from the name of one's father or a paternal ancestor.

n.

A name so derived.

For a complete explaination see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronymic

Originally this method was not intended to provide an actual surname. Just to provide a way in a small village to sort out family relations by tagging each of a man's sons with his given name in addition to their own. This can be achieved by adding Mac or O at the beginning as was done in Scotland and Ireland to indicate that William MacDonald is the son of Donald. In England "son" was added at the end of the name to form a new surname such as John's son = Johnson. In Wales the map or mab used became ap or ab and was not capitalized. For example; Owen's sons; Griffth, David, Owen, and Llewellyn would be known as Griffith ap Owen, David ap Owen, Owen ap Owen and Llewellyn ap Owen. Very simple for one generation. But as these appellations morphed from casual identifiers into surnames, the grandsons would bear each of their father's given names and thus the identifiers; Griffth, David, Owen, and Llewellyn. So in a few generations dozens of new "surnames" were created, in the process causing a present day nightmare for the pursuit of a Welsh ancestor.

However, it can be done from Church records from about 1592. In The Welsh Lineage of John Lewis (1592-1657), Emigrant to Gloucester, Virginia, Grace McLean Moses explains how a pedigree for John Lewis was researched over a period of years at considerable expense as it required her hiring expert Welsh genealogists and waiting sometimes six months to hear back from the researchers in those pre-Internet days. This little book is interesting to read as it proves that if one has the resources and patience, the records are there in Wales, just difficult to extract. One would assume the Internet has had a beneficial effect on this type of research. If only for expediting the communications.

As the Administrator of the Wales_Cymru_DNA Project, I am convinced that many ancestors are recorded as English when they were actually Welsh. This is unfortunate because a very rich heritage is consequently unknown. Arguably they really are "A Breed Apart" as suggested by Professor Stephen Oppenheimer in The Real Eve: Modern Man's Journey Out of Africa. Traditionally the difference between the English and Scots, Welsh, Irish and Cornish was attributed to the influence of invaders such as the Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Vikings settling in the UK hundreds of years ago.

But Professor Oppenheimer says the Celts are descended from an ancient people living on the Atlantic coast when Britain was attached to Europe. The English are more closely related to the Germanic peoples of the interior.

"The English ... are more linked to continental Europe. The Scots, the Irish, the Welsh and the Cornish are similar in their genetic pattern to the Basque."



Additionally, in two recently published books, Blood of the Isles, by Brian Sykes and The Origins of the British, by Stephen Oppenheimer, both authors state that according to genetic evidence, most Welsh people and most Britons descend from the Iberian Peninsula, as a result of different migrations that took place during the Mesolithic and the Neolithic eras, and which laid the foundations for the present-day populations in the British Isles, indicating an ancient relationship among the populations of Atlantic Europe.[21][22][23] According to Stephen Oppenheimer 96% of lineages in Llangefni in north Wales derive from Iberia. Genetic research on the Y-chromosome has shown that the Welsh, like the Irish, share a large proportion of their ancestry with the Basques of Northern Spain and South Western France, although the Welsh have a greater presumed Neolithic input than both the Irish and the Basques.[24] Genetic marker R1b averages from 83-89% amongst the Welsh.[24][25]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_people



In the Wales_Cymru_DNA project we recognize many names and are adding additional ones as they are discovered. But often we are unable to add would be participants because they cannot document their purported Welsh ancestry, but have only oral histories of ancestors being Welsh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales_DNA_Project

In addition to looking for a Welsh origin for ancestors in obvious places such as the Welsh Tract in Pennsylvania, genealogists should look for ancestors who disembarked from Bristol. Most will call these ancestors English, but many were not. Consider this example:

The Coming of The Welsh
In Ohio.

The first Welshman to enter the territory of Ohio was the Reverend David Jones who labored as a missionary among the Shawnee and Delaware Indians in 1772 and 1773. The second Welshman known tohave traversed Ohio ground was General Anthony Wayne. General Wayne with his army, came to Ohio in 1793 being commissioned by the government " to make an end of Indian troubles on the frontier."

The first permanent Welsh settlers in Ohio were Ezekiel Hughes and Edward Bebb, who came from Llanbrynmair, Montgomeryshire, North Wales. These two men were responsible for the first definite step westward on the part of Welsh emigrants. Hughes and Bebb were instrumental in persuading a company of fifty Welsh people in their neighborhood in Llanbrynmair to emigrate to America. This company walked from Llanbrynmair to Bristol, England, where on August 11th, 1795, they embarked on the ship " Maria " and sailed for America. On a perlious voyage of fourteen weeks they entered the Delaware Bay and in a few days thereafter reached the port of Philadelphia. These emigrants became the pioneer settlers of Ebensgburg, Cambria County, Pennsylvania, of Paddy's Run, Butler County, Ohio, and of the Welsh Hills in Licking County, Ohio.

Once you learn to examine names beginning with B or P as possibly being Welsh, you
will start seeing them everywhere. Ab Owen became Bowen and ab Evan became Bevan and Blevan. Ap Hywell became Powell and ap Hugh became Pugh. Derivatives such as Lewis from Llewellyn are important also. Lewis one the most common names in America. It can be from the French Louis or it can be English, but most often it is from the derivative of Llewellyn, the name of two of Wales' most famous princes; Llewellyn the Great and Llewellyn the Last.

The ancient Welsh patronymic naming system can cause significant problems for genealogists. Patronymics describes the process of giving a male child the father's given name, or forename, as a surname. This means that a family's name changes in successive generations.
The process of conversion to the system of fixed names in Wales began in the 15th century and continued through to the middle of the 18th century. The trend was stratified socially - the higher classes in society began the process, which then was passed on to the lower classes.
Consequently, genealogists whose search has reached this period in Welsh history can sometimes find that their search grinds to a halt as family names disappear into the patronymic system of naming.
The Welsh patronymic system describes family trees in terms of the male line only and records the family association in the 'ap' or 'ab' prefix (ap is a contraction of the Welsh word mab, which means son). So, Rhys ap Dafydd means, in English, Rhys son of David.

Modern Welsh surnames such as Powell, Price and Prichard are the result of this contraction and a progressive tendency to Anglicise Welsh names: under the patronymic system they would have been ap Hywel; ap Rhys and ap Richard. The names Bowen and Bevan were derived in the same way.



For a look at the diversity of Welsh surnames; many are listed here:

https://www.familytreedna.com/public/WalesDNA/default.aspx

Learning to recognize these Welsh names or at least the more common ones will greatly aid your genealogical research and perhaps lead you back to a lesser known but no less exciting country and people.

Related:

http://www.amateur-genealogist.com/welsh_research_links.htm




© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Friday, April 3, 2009

American Indian Holocaust and Survival

American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since 1492 by Russell Thornton (1987)

Virginian Robert Beverly wrote of his Countrymen:

In all the latter voyages they never su much as endeavored to come near the place where the first settlement was attempted at Cape Hatteras; neither had they any pity on those poor hundred and fifteen souls settled there in 1587 of whom there has never since been any account, no relief sent to them, nor so much as an enquiry made after them, whether they were dead or alive, till about 3 yars after this, when Chesapeak bay in Virginia was settled, which hitherto had never been seen by any English Man. So strong was the desire of riches and so eager the pursuit of a rich trade, that all concern for the lives of their fellow Christians, kindred, neighbours and country-men, weighed nothing in the comparison, thou an enquiry might have been easily made, when they were so near them. (Beverley, 1705: 24-25)

Note that he mentions them as "kindred".




© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share