Pages

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Native Americans Descended From a Single Ancestral Group, DNA Study Confirms


April 28, 2009

For two decades, researchers have been using a growing volume of genetic data to debate whether ancestors of Native Americans emigrated to the New World in one wave or successive waves, or from one ancestral Asian population or a number of different populations.

Now, after painstakingly comparing DNA samples from people in dozens of modern-day Native American and Eurasian groups, an international team of scientists thinks it can put the matter to rest: Virtually without exception the new evidence supports the single ancestral population theory.

“Our work provides strong evidence that, in general, Native Americans are more closely related to each other than to any other existing Asian populations, except those that live at the very edge of the Bering Strait,” said Kari Britt Schroeder, a lecturer at the University of California, Davis, and the first author on the paper describing the study.

“While earlier studies have already supported this conclusion, what’s different about our work is that it provides the first solid data that simply cannot be reconciled with multiple ancestral populations,” said Schroeder, who was a Ph.D. student in anthropology at the university when she did the research.

The study is published in the May issue of the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Cont. here:

http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=9101





© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Monday, April 27, 2009

ROBESON COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING

*WHAT: ROBESON COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING

WHEN: SATURDAY, MAY 2ND, 2009

WHERE: O. P. OWENS AGRICULTURE BUILDING, LUMBERTON, NC

PUBLIC IS WELCOME * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


TOPIC: THE SURVIVAL OF THE LOST COLONY: THE UNTOLD STORY by William V.
Pate*

At 2pm on Saturday, May 2nd, the guest speaker at the Robeson County
Historical and Genealogical Society monthly meeting in Lumberton will be
William V. Pate, resident of Hope Mills and author of “*The Survival of the
Lost Colony: The Untold Story*”. The public is invited to attend and to
purchase an autographed copy of Mr. Pate’s book at a reduced price.

Mr. Pate examines the suppositions given for the disappearance of members of
Sir Walter Raleigh’s colony on North Carolina’s Roanoke Island in 1587. Most
historians have theorized that, after they stayed behind when their ships
sailed back to England for supplies, the colonists were murdered by hostile
savages [meaning unChristian people] or died of starvation. Most North
Carolinians hold to the theory that these colonists survived by being
assimilated into the local Croatoan Indian tribe.

In his 33 years of research, Mr. Pate examined countless documents of the
period, many written by men of authority on the expedition. His book
provides verbatim transcriptions followed by his comments on the insights
they provide for solving this mystery.

The author’s prints and lists of the people & places connected to this
colonization are an unexpected benefit for readers. He includes tales handed
down by local Indians that Virginia Dare, the first person born in the
Roanoke colony, lies buried near the base of a several-hundred-years-old
tree in Robeson County. Of special interest to Robesonians will be the DNA
project that many expect to provide a definitive answer to part of this old
American mystery.

The program will be held in the O.P. Owens Agriculture Center Auditorium at
455 Caton Road, which is just west of Interstate 95 between Highways 72 and
711 in Lumberton (next to the Robeson County Health Department). To
accommodate the public, the speaker will precede the meeting.

Contact Sam West sam.west.1@gmail.com

UPDATE: Hat Tip: Joy King

“The Survival of The Lost Colony” is $19.95, which includes shipping. Write to 2550 Thrower Road, Hope Mills, NC 28348, or call 910-483-9960.



© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Monday, April 13, 2009

A Look at the Patronymic Naming System

by Janet Crain
It is interesting to note that two preeminent Lost Colony researchers; both William Powell and David Beers Quinn, stated that some of the Lost Colonists were Welsh. With that in mind an investigation into the surnames of the colonists reveals many considered Welsh.

The following possibly Welsh surnames were borne by these persons who visited the Island of Roanoke on one or more trips made there in the 1580's.

Carrow - Carew
Cecil - variant of Seisyll
Chevan - variant of Evan?
Ellis
Evans
Gibbs - variant of Gibby?
Griffyn
Humphrey
Jenkins
Jones*
Perry (could be Parry)
Pew usually spelled Pugh from ap Hugh (son of Hugh)
Phevens usually spelled Plevens from ap Evans
Powell from ap Howell (for Prince Hywel very popular name)
Pugh from ap Hugh
Robyns
Robert*
Vaughan
Williams*
Wythers

*(sometimes)

1587 was early in the use of surnames in Wales, lending credence to a theory that if these persons were Welsh, they had already emigrated to England prior to joining the other colonists who set out to establish Raleigh Citee in the New World. They could have come into contact with John White in London where a tight little community of craftsmen and trades people lived. Several Colonists have been documented to be from that area of London. Everyone needed to have a skilled trade such as tiler, mason, carpentry, etc to contribute to the success of this venture. They may have been part of this community. But it is also conceivable that simply their entry into the larger world of joining this enterprise required the adoption of a surname for legal and social purposes.

Therefore it will be useful to learn a little bit about the Welsh Patromymin Naming System as an aid in recognizing Welsh surnames. The patronymic naming system is defined as:

adj.

Of, relating to, or derived from the name of one's father or a paternal ancestor.

n.

A name so derived.

For a complete explaination see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronymic

Originally this method was not intended to provide an actual surname. Just to provide a way in a small village to sort out family relations by tagging each of a man's sons with his given name in addition to their own. This can be achieved by adding Mac or O at the beginning as was done in Scotland and Ireland to indicate that William MacDonald is the son of Donald. In England "son" was added at the end of the name to form a new surname such as John's son = Johnson. In Wales the map or mab used became ap or ab and was not capitalized. For example; Owen's sons; Griffth, David, Owen, and Llewellyn would be known as Griffith ap Owen, David ap Owen, Owen ap Owen and Llewellyn ap Owen. Very simple for one generation. But as these appellations morphed from casual identifiers into surnames, the grandsons would bear each of their father's given names and thus the identifiers; Griffth, David, Owen, and Llewellyn. So in a few generations dozens of new "surnames" were created, in the process causing a present day nightmare for the pursuit of a Welsh ancestor.

However, it can be done from Church records from about 1592. In The Welsh Lineage of John Lewis (1592-1657), Emigrant to Gloucester, Virginia, Grace McLean Moses explains how a pedigree for John Lewis was researched over a period of years at considerable expense as it required her hiring expert Welsh genealogists and waiting sometimes six months to hear back from the researchers in those pre-Internet days. This little book is interesting to read as it proves that if one has the resources and patience, the records are there in Wales, just difficult to extract. One would assume the Internet has had a beneficial effect on this type of research. If only for expediting the communications.

As the Administrator of the Wales_Cymru_DNA Project, I am convinced that many ancestors are recorded as English when they were actually Welsh. This is unfortunate because a very rich heritage is consequently unknown. Arguably they really are "A Breed Apart" as suggested by Professor Stephen Oppenheimer in The Real Eve: Modern Man's Journey Out of Africa. Traditionally the difference between the English and Scots, Welsh, Irish and Cornish was attributed to the influence of invaders such as the Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Vikings settling in the UK hundreds of years ago.

But Professor Oppenheimer says the Celts are descended from an ancient people living on the Atlantic coast when Britain was attached to Europe. The English are more closely related to the Germanic peoples of the interior.

"The English ... are more linked to continental Europe. The Scots, the Irish, the Welsh and the Cornish are similar in their genetic pattern to the Basque."



Additionally, in two recently published books, Blood of the Isles, by Brian Sykes and The Origins of the British, by Stephen Oppenheimer, both authors state that according to genetic evidence, most Welsh people and most Britons descend from the Iberian Peninsula, as a result of different migrations that took place during the Mesolithic and the Neolithic eras, and which laid the foundations for the present-day populations in the British Isles, indicating an ancient relationship among the populations of Atlantic Europe.[21][22][23] According to Stephen Oppenheimer 96% of lineages in Llangefni in north Wales derive from Iberia. Genetic research on the Y-chromosome has shown that the Welsh, like the Irish, share a large proportion of their ancestry with the Basques of Northern Spain and South Western France, although the Welsh have a greater presumed Neolithic input than both the Irish and the Basques.[24] Genetic marker R1b averages from 83-89% amongst the Welsh.[24][25]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_people



In the Wales_Cymru_DNA project we recognize many names and are adding additional ones as they are discovered. But often we are unable to add would be participants because they cannot document their purported Welsh ancestry, but have only oral histories of ancestors being Welsh.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales_DNA_Project

In addition to looking for a Welsh origin for ancestors in obvious places such as the Welsh Tract in Pennsylvania, genealogists should look for ancestors who disembarked from Bristol. Most will call these ancestors English, but many were not. Consider this example:

The Coming of The Welsh
In Ohio.

The first Welshman to enter the territory of Ohio was the Reverend David Jones who labored as a missionary among the Shawnee and Delaware Indians in 1772 and 1773. The second Welshman known tohave traversed Ohio ground was General Anthony Wayne. General Wayne with his army, came to Ohio in 1793 being commissioned by the government " to make an end of Indian troubles on the frontier."

The first permanent Welsh settlers in Ohio were Ezekiel Hughes and Edward Bebb, who came from Llanbrynmair, Montgomeryshire, North Wales. These two men were responsible for the first definite step westward on the part of Welsh emigrants. Hughes and Bebb were instrumental in persuading a company of fifty Welsh people in their neighborhood in Llanbrynmair to emigrate to America. This company walked from Llanbrynmair to Bristol, England, where on August 11th, 1795, they embarked on the ship " Maria " and sailed for America. On a perlious voyage of fourteen weeks they entered the Delaware Bay and in a few days thereafter reached the port of Philadelphia. These emigrants became the pioneer settlers of Ebensgburg, Cambria County, Pennsylvania, of Paddy's Run, Butler County, Ohio, and of the Welsh Hills in Licking County, Ohio.

Once you learn to examine names beginning with B or P as possibly being Welsh, you
will start seeing them everywhere. Ab Owen became Bowen and ab Evan became Bevan and Blevan. Ap Hywell became Powell and ap Hugh became Pugh. Derivatives such as Lewis from Llewellyn are important also. Lewis one the most common names in America. It can be from the French Louis or it can be English, but most often it is from the derivative of Llewellyn, the name of two of Wales' most famous princes; Llewellyn the Great and Llewellyn the Last.

The ancient Welsh patronymic naming system can cause significant problems for genealogists. Patronymics describes the process of giving a male child the father's given name, or forename, as a surname. This means that a family's name changes in successive generations.
The process of conversion to the system of fixed names in Wales began in the 15th century and continued through to the middle of the 18th century. The trend was stratified socially - the higher classes in society began the process, which then was passed on to the lower classes.
Consequently, genealogists whose search has reached this period in Welsh history can sometimes find that their search grinds to a halt as family names disappear into the patronymic system of naming.
The Welsh patronymic system describes family trees in terms of the male line only and records the family association in the 'ap' or 'ab' prefix (ap is a contraction of the Welsh word mab, which means son). So, Rhys ap Dafydd means, in English, Rhys son of David.

Modern Welsh surnames such as Powell, Price and Prichard are the result of this contraction and a progressive tendency to Anglicise Welsh names: under the patronymic system they would have been ap Hywel; ap Rhys and ap Richard. The names Bowen and Bevan were derived in the same way.



For a look at the diversity of Welsh surnames; many are listed here:

https://www.familytreedna.com/public/WalesDNA/default.aspx

Learning to recognize these Welsh names or at least the more common ones will greatly aid your genealogical research and perhaps lead you back to a lesser known but no less exciting country and people.

Related:

http://www.amateur-genealogist.com/welsh_research_links.htm




© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Friday, April 3, 2009

American Indian Holocaust and Survival

American Indian Holocaust and Survival: A Population History Since 1492 by Russell Thornton (1987)

Virginian Robert Beverly wrote of his Countrymen:

In all the latter voyages they never su much as endeavored to come near the place where the first settlement was attempted at Cape Hatteras; neither had they any pity on those poor hundred and fifteen souls settled there in 1587 of whom there has never since been any account, no relief sent to them, nor so much as an enquiry made after them, whether they were dead or alive, till about 3 yars after this, when Chesapeak bay in Virginia was settled, which hitherto had never been seen by any English Man. So strong was the desire of riches and so eager the pursuit of a rich trade, that all concern for the lives of their fellow Christians, kindred, neighbours and country-men, weighed nothing in the comparison, thou an enquiry might have been easily made, when they were so near them. (Beverley, 1705: 24-25)

Note that he mentions them as "kindred".




© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Monday, March 23, 2009

Among the Tuscarora: The Strange and Mysterious Death of John Lawson

Hat Tip: Tari


Marjorie Hudson, Among the Tuscarora: The Strange and Mysterious Death of John Lawson, Gentleman, Explorer, and Writer, North Carolina Literary Review, 1992

Text and Image(s) from Journal Article

[page 62]

AMONG THE TUSCARORA

THE Strange AND Mysterious Death Of

John Lawson

GENTLEMAN, EXPLORER, AND WRITER











[Image from the North Carolina State Archives, Division of Archives and History]

The death of John Lawson, a drawing by Baron Cristoph Von Graffenried


by Marjorie Hudson


They've taken his clothes, picked the straight razor out of his pocket: one brave fingers it, touches the blade - bright blood springs from his thumb and he laughs. The pitch pine split by the women is ready, a clay pot full of splinters, and now, one by one, the women thread these needles into his flesh, pushing just hard enough to bring the blood, to press past the strange white skin to the devil underneath. The man stands quiet at first. Then he begins to scream.

In 1711, the Tuscarora Indians of North Carolina murdered John Lawson, sticking him all over with pitch pine splinters before setting him ablaze. At the time, Lawson may have been the best English friend the Tuscarora had. From his first encounters, he seems clearly to have respected them. And in his writings, he lauded their natural graces, admired their courage, and blamed his fellow Englishmen for their destruction.

Lawson's death was only the opening act of "the most deadly Indian war in North Carolina history" (Lefler and Newsome 27). When it ended in 1713, the Tuscarora as Lawson knew them were no more. Today, Lawson's book, A New Voyage to Carolina, remains our most reliable record of the Tuscarora and the other Indians of Carolina's Coastal Plain and Piedmont; his journals captured those cultures in prose just before they were wiped clean from their rivers and creekside settlements, leaving the rich soil salted with arrowheads that emerge in cottonfields after rain. To this day, farmers pick them up, slip them in their pockets, and ruminate over them, as if they are pieces of some compelling but unsolvable puzzle.

In May 1700, John Lawson, filled with the spirit of adventure, set sail for the New World, heading for North Carolina on the advice of a world traveler he had met by chance in England. By December, he had somehow garnered an assignment from the Lords Proprietors to survey the unknown lands of the Carolina interior. As he traveled, he collected plant specimens for a London botanist; he also kept a journal describing the New World plants and wildlife. Lawson wrote about them in such lush detail it's not surprising that a later plagiarism of his journal was entitled "The Newly Discovered Eden." But his most compelling records are those describing Eden's native inhabitants.

Gary Snyder says that when early explorers confronted wilderness and natural societies, they "had to give up something of themselves: they had to look into their own sense of what it meant to be a human being" (13). What he calls "the etiquette of the wild" requires that we "learn the terrain, nod to all the plants and animals and birds, ford the streams and cross the ridges, and tell a good story when we get back home" (24). Surely John Lawson did that; nearly three centuries after its publication, his story still makes fascinating reading, as it opens up for us the mysteries of the first North Carolinians.

Lawson treats the Carolina Indians in two sections of his book. In the first, a narrative of his first walking trip through North and South Carolina, he introduces readers to successive nations as he encounters them. In his journal entries, each nation is freshly revealed as a discrete social and political unit, with physical differences, special foods and ceremonies, clothing and housing, tall tales and superstitions. In his last section, he lumps together these distinct nations into a general portrait, "An Account of the Indians of North Carolina," in which he draws from his eight years of continued study and travel from his new home in eastern North Carolina.

[Page 64]

On 28 December 1700, Lawson set off from Charleston, South Carolina on his 59-day pilgrimage into the heart of the Carolina frontier. He traveled light. Packed into a single huge canoe was all of his equipment - guns, powder, some food, a religious tract, his journal, blankets trinkets for trading - and all of his crew: a party of five Englishmen, three Indian men, and one Indian woman.

Lawson seems to have been the kind of fellow who pops out of the bedroll raring to go, rain or shine. On at least one occasion, he was ready two hours before his Indian guide. He rarely stopped to rest, leaving slowpokes to catch up as best they could at the end of the day. The group covered, on foot or in canoes, an average of 10 to 20 miles a day - 30 on a good day. They never lingered long, stopping a day or two at an Indian town, visiting and feasting with the chief, trading a bit, hunting up some food and a new guide, then traveling on. Between settlements, they camped out in the woods, dining alfresco, often on turkey or opossum stew. For "a thousand miles" (more like 500 as the crow flies), they followed rivers and trading paths, from the South Carolina coast to the Piedmont of North Carolina, in a crescent-shaped trail that eventually turned back east toward the ocean, concluding between Washington and Bath, by the Pamlico River. For virtually every river Lawson encountered, he also found an Indian nation with its own ruler and customs; often the nation would bear that river's name. The Santee, the Congaree, the Wateree, the Waxhaw, the Catawba, the Eno, the Meherrin, the Neuse, the Sapona, and the Pamlico - all were nations as well as waterways.

Lawson's reaction to the amazing peoples he encounters is remarkably respectful for his own time and culture. He shows particular interest in Indian food, social mores, marriage customs, burial practices, and medicine men. He compares the demure Indian wives' ways favorably to those of some sharp-tongued Englishwomen; he finds sexual etiquette among a number of tribes amusing but oddly sensible. Marriage, divorce, and sexual favors are generally matters of mutual consent; the women are sexually liberated. He calls the religious men outrageous liars, yet painstakingly records their useful herbs and cures as well as the strange phenomena they claim to control. The Waxhaw, Catawba, and Sapona nations seem to impress him the most. For the Tuscarora, he shows a wry sympathy and a healthy respect.


Full Article Here:

http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/exhibits/lawson/htmlFiles/TUSC.html


Related:

http://the-lost-colony.blogspot.com/search?q=john+lawson



© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, March 22, 2009

ROYAL or COLONIAL PLATS on LITTLE PEE DEE RIVER

Province of South Carolina

Contributed by Jo Church Dickerson, 1998.


Marion County, South Carolina

Genealogy & History

Regarding the information in the list below: The first name is the person in whose name the plat was recorded; the description is part of that given in the plat itself - the date is the date of recording, not the date of the survey; the final series of numbers is the Archives numbering system for locating the plat. It refers to the record series, the volume, the page number, and the item number on that page. You will need all of these if ordering the plat. If you find an error, please bring it to my attention.--Jo

SINCLAIR, James;

plat for 450a in Craven Co; 1735/02/24

0009 003 0003 00075 00

BREMAR, Mrs. Elizabeth;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1735/03/23

0009 003 0002 00113 01

BREMAR, Mrs. Elizabeth;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1735/03/23

0009 003 0002 00113 02

DANIEL, John;

plat for 650a in Craven Co; 1735/03/23

0009 003 0002 00191 02

HESKELL, George;

plat for 500a in Craven Co; 1735/03/24

0009 003 0002 00314 01

SANDIFORD, John;

plat for 550a in Craven Co; 1735/03/25

0009 003 0003 00124 01

ATKIN, Joseph;

plat for 412a in Craven Co; 1735/5/30

0009 003 0002 00353 02

SMITH, Christopher;

plat for 415a in Craven Co; 1735/06/15

0009 003 0003 00030 00 (sic)

ROBINSON, Joseph;

plat for 350a in Craven Co; 1735/06/16

0009 003 0003 00248 02

TALLEY, Alexander;

plat for 300a in Craven Co; 1735/06/17

0009 003 0003 00142 01

MAZYCK, Isaac Jr;

plat for 230a in Craven Co; 1735/08/15

0009 003 0003 00342 01

NERI, Peter Francis;

plat for 500a in Craven Co; 1735/11/01

0009 003 0003 00337 00

POOLE, William;

plat for 500a in Craven Co; 1735/11/03

0009 003 0003 00274 01

HAMMERTON, John;

plat for 1000a in Kingston Township; 1735/11/08

0009 003 0002 00313 02

CROCKAT, James;

plat for 500a in Craven Co; 1735/11/09

0009 003 0002 00088 02

RAMSEY, William;

plat for 350a in Craven Co; 1736/01/07

0009 003 0002 00518 01

SERRE, Noah;

plat for 1047a in Craven co; 1736/03/10

0009 003 0003 00048 00

ROBINSON, Joseph;

plat for 400a in Craven Co; 1736/03/26

0009 003 0003 00480 00

BOWMAN, Samuel;

plat for 135oa in Craven Co; 1736/03/26

0009 003 0004 00134 02

MANIGAULT, Gabriel;

plat for 1250a in Craven Co; 1736/03/27

0009 003 0002 00447 01

HORRY, Elias Jr.;

plat for 524a in Craven Co; 1736/04/08

0009 003 0002 00308? 01

JORDAN, John;

plat for 200a in Craven Co; 1736 /11/10

0009 003 0003 00452 01

ROCHE, Jordan;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1736/11/19

0009 003 0003 00258 00

ARTHUR, John;

plat for 400a in Queensborough Towhship; 1736/12/17

0009 003 0002 00172 01

JOULLY, John;

plat for 400a in Queensborough Township; 1736/12/17

0009 003 0003 00446 01

FORSTER, Arthur;

plat for 800a in Craven Co; 1737/05/02

0009 003 0002 00292 01

ATKINSON, Anthony;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1737/05/26

0009 003 0002 00351 01

HUGHES, Meredith;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1737/05/26

0009 003 0002 00416 02

SCREVEN, Elisha;

plat for 850a in Craven Co; 1737/06/22

0009 003 0002 00487 01

OWEN, John;

plat for 900a in Craven Co; 1737/06/22

0009 003 0003 00309 02

FORD, Nathaniel;

plat for 350a in Craven Co; 1737/07/15

0009 003 0004 00113 02

HORRY, Daniel;

plat for 300a in Craven Co; 1737/09/03

0009 003 0002 00316 01

HORRY, Daniel;

plat for 825a in Craven Co; 1737/09/04

0009 003 0003 00498 01

HEXT, Edward;

plat for 1000a in Craven Co; 1737/11/07

0009 003 0002 00333 02

BARTON, John;

plat for 600a in Craven Co; 1737/11/11

0009 003 0004 00137 01

HEXT, Edward;

plat for 250a in Craven Co; 1737/11/18

0009 003 0002 00418 01

BROCKINGTON, Capt. William;

plat for 250a in Craven Co; 1737/11/18

0009 003 0004 00130 01

WATIES, William;

plat for 350a in Craven Co; 1739/12/14

0009 003 0004 00094 00

GIBSON, Gideon;

plat for 450a in Craven Co; 1748/04/13

0009 003 0004 00510 01


(note from History Chasers, there are more names listed)


This is from the Marion County, South Carolina

Genealogy & History website, read more HERE



© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Virtual Jamestown
















Virtual Jamestown is an excellent site with a lot of information for researchers in the area. This page is titled, The Practice of Slavery.

The following selections use selected excerpts from wills, deeds, and the recorded minutes of the Virginia Assembly and Council to illustrate the treatment of African slaves and Native American servants and slaves in Virginia during the seventeenth century. The documents also reveal that relations between English and Africans had a degree of fluidity during the seventeenth century as Virginia developed into a society where race, instead of status, determined one's place in the social hierarchy.

Find the selections here.

Here is a page of Laws.

Find the home page here.


© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share

Monday, March 9, 2009

Speech by Powhatan, as recorded by John Smith, 1609

Why will you take by force what you may obtain by love? Why will you destroy us who supply you with food? What can you get by war? . . . We are unarmed, and willing to give you what you ask, if you come in a friendly manner. . . .

I am not so simple as not to know it is better to eat good meat, sleep comfortably, live quietly with my women and children, laugh and be merry with the English, and being their friend, trade for their copper and hatchets, than to run away from them. . . .

Take away your guns and swords, the cause of all our jealousy, or you may die in the same manner.






© History Chasers

Click here to view all recent Searching for the Lost Colony DNA Blog posts

Bookmark and Share